ALL COMPARISONS

ASTRO WITH VS WITHOUT AFTERCODE

Same Astro.
A different editing day.

Astro is the foundation. Aftercode adds a visual editor and an AI-driven CMS around the project you already build.

AFTERCODE IS IN DEVELOPMENT

This compares an Astro project without an added CMS to the workflow we are building with Aftercode. You can also bring another CMS or build your own editing tools.

Building the site

Astro alone

Build components, styles, and pages in your chosen editor, with or without a coding agent.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

Keep the same development setup. Connect Aftercode when you want to refine the page or work with its content.

Content structure

Astro alone

Content collections can organize local or remote data, with schemas for validation and types.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

Use supported project sources and their context to infer a useful CMS interface. Existing schemas remain useful input.

Source: Astro content collections ↗

Visual adjustments

Astro alone

Edit source and inspect the result, or add a visual editing integration of your choice.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

Adjust supported styles and content with the page in front of you. The on-site demo shows this intended interaction.

Client editing

Astro alone

Choose, connect, or build a content editing interface for people who will not work in source files.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

Planned browser workspaces for client content, media, approved sections, preview, and publishing.

What gets deployed

Astro alone

Astro can generate static pages or render selected routes on demand.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

Starting with static Astro sites. The editor stays separate from the published site; dynamic features need their own implementation.

Source: Astro rendering ↗

Project ownership

Astro alone

Your project lives in source files and can use the hosting that fits its output.

ASTRO + AFTERCODE

The same ownership goal, including published content and media. Designed to keep building without the Aftercode service.

THE DECISION THAT MATTERS

Astro does not need replacing.

The opportunity is in what happens around it: fewer small edits sent back to the agent, less manual CMS setup, and a useful place for the client to make the next update.

Explore the Aftercode workflow

Consider Aftercode when…

You like building Astro sites with an agent, want visual control over the finish, and need to hand content editing to a client.

↳

Astro alone may fit better when…

You prefer editing source, already have a CMS that works well, or do not need another editing interface.

AFTERCODE · IN DEVELOPMENT

Make room for what comes after.

Build with your agent. Finish with your eye. Give your clients a place of their own.